220.127.116.11 wrote: Yes, it was rude of me to call you an ass and I apologize for that but your behavior is no excuse for undoing my legit edits.
My behavior? I'm perfectly allowed to undo your useless garbage edits, encouraged even. You, however, have no right to make personal attacks against me because I undid your garbage edits. Do you see why you're the lying troll and I am the rational user assuming good faith here? Good. Now wait out your block and don't contact me in the future.
After all this spam, there should be no doubt about you being a useless little troll. I'm not even gonna bother removing your spam anymore. I'll leave it up to Seddie to block you.
You will be truly disappointed then when you see who will be blocked or worse banned.
As you can see Seddielover12, Apollyon嫌っ just keeps proving how rude, provocative and irrationell he truly is. He also removed my message to Grand Duchess Anastasia. If you compare all of his contributions with all of mine you will see that my edits are more legit than his will ever be. Again, I strongly suggest a ban for Apollyon嫌っ.
I think we should put for each fighter a slideshow on their main page as opposed to a gallery as the slideshow is more compact and neater than the galleries.We can put all the images in one neat set rather than in a separate page.Also Im considering once tekken 7 is released is making videos on youtube for each character with all of there endings so there is only one video for those here.Furthermore i think it would be a good idea to have one page for all the moves from each game for each character as again it would be neater.Would you agree with this
Ugh, slideshows are rather unattractive and tiny, which is why I favor galleries. However, I am thinking of adding tabs for every game a character appeared in & add their renders (like Soulcalibur's). Galleries should have their own pages (especially with a complex series such as Tekken), just take a look at Mortal Kombat's wiki! Plus, the galleries are not sloppy but neat. And I don't know if you noticed, but the individual pages for moves are flourishing; not diminishing. Separate ending videos are appropiate so it'd be a huge shame to squeeze all of a character's endings into one video. Now THAT sounds a bit crammed and sloppy to me. Think we're on the right path. Glad you feel this way, but I think everything will work with more effort.
I want to ask a request from you about the rules of the relationships of the characters. I just want to tell u that everything on this is compelled remarkable, that's why I joined. The request is: ever chat cede page generally has an infobox with the family relation, and of course the section about the character relationship. Can't we balance between it?
I meant by that is can we make only the character relation ship in an infobox only blood/adoptive things and the character section relationship the explanation? I mean let me give you an example about Alisa: Alisa is an android not a cyborg. On her infobox Jin Kazama D.B. is included on it. But Jin is her master while D.B. is her creator, they do not related by blood as family. Including them on relationship section is okay because it meant explain character outside the family, right? Like her role on Jin and D.B. If she turned to be actually a cyborg like Bryan Fury, then it's possible to add him in and say it's her father, because on that case she will half-human, half-robot. Alisa was created after his deceased daughter, then maybe we can add a separate page about the deceased one but I don't think it's a good idea, right?
More examples/explanation here: titled as misunderstand and sorry.
My point is asking you if u could apply this rule of relationship infobox and the section one. Yet Alisa current page included Jin and D.B. on it as a creator and master. What the point of having the character relationship section if that's the case? What do u think about that?
I wanted to change/edit it but I want to take ur permission on it to not repeat the same mistake remember haha O////O?
So what do u think, is it going to be a good idea, or the current status of it is good?
Oh and last question: Did I made proud of me with my new edits ^_^? Thank you ^_^. Tekken brother (talk) 16:32, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
Nahh, I can not stand the white background. I think the dark background is more in tune to the color schemes of the Tekken series itself. It looks quite badass. I think the white would make it look more basic and not creative.
What I'm saying here is that at the very least the editors Wiki should make an effort to verify information first before entering it in the Wiki itself.
With regards to my concern, only Administrators can delete pages. Therefore, even if you tell me to just edit stuff up; that's not the point here.
Going back to Kiefer Sutherland, there is absolutely no source to back up anyone's claim of him voicing Lars or whatsoever. Even his page in the English-language and Japanese-language Wikipedias doesn't mention any Tekken. Do keep in mind that those Wiki sites have way better Administration/Moderator back-up than in here. No offense.
About the Ancient Aliens guy (Clotworthy); I was able to find a back-up to that so disregard that part. The two animals, however, are just as dubious as the Kiefer Sutherland one.
First off, you tell ME before you go deleting all the content off a page. Don't do it then tell me about it! That bs really pissed me off especially since I had last edited it! Know your limits next time.
Can you please check the activity log first before you accuse me of doing unnecessary edits to Voice Actor pages?
Furthermore, please try to fully-understand my messages because you had irreverently accused me although it may be due to possible misunderstanding with what I had said. I have posted my messages in the best possible grammar so just re-read it again.
Like I said, I had not touched any of the pages that I had mentioned. You may even want to check the Edit History of Kiefer Sutherland, Robert Clotworthy and the other two I mentioned to be sure.
If an Anon did it, check if my IP Address matches with that Anon. Actually, I don't edit Wikis anonymously and allowing anons to edit this Wiki is the real BS to begin with.
My objective in this Wiki is to be able to contribute Legit and Verified Information as well as to do some translations if necessary. If you are already equating me with troublesome individuals then that's just effing unfair on my part. I took time here to warn you about left out mistakes and there you go.